Large Bore IV Access Showdown: Do you know which IV cannula can deliver fluid to your patient the fastest?

For decades now we’ve all been reciting the mantra that any sick or shocked patient needs:

“2 large bore IVs”

We’ve also all been taught that “short and thick does the trick” due to Poiseuille’s Law which states that flow is directly proportional to the fourth power of the radius, and inversely proportional to the length:

poiseuilles law

But despite our best efforts we couldn’t find a direct comparison of the various types of IV cannulas and catheters we used at work to see which one is actually best. We had unanswered questions that needed answers.

Which IV cannula/catheter delivers IV fluid the fastest?  
How much faster is a 14G compared to a 16G, 18G or 20G?
Is a standard 14G faster than a RIC line or sheath introducer?
And just how much slower is a central line at delivering fluid?

Behold, the Large Bore IV Access Showdown. We’ve hooked up all of the major types of IV lines you’re likely to find in an average Australian ED to a rapid infusor device, and timed how long it took to pump through a litre of saline.

So which line was best? You’ll have to watch the video and find out!
(If you can’t stand the wait, skip ahead to the results at the 10:40 mark)

So the 8.5Fr RIC line was the winner!

Here’s our video on how to insert a RIC line

Here’s our rather unscientific, but hopefully visually useful comparison of the relative speeds at which fluid can be pumped through the different lines in our test:

Relative rates of different IV cannulasClick to enlarge

And here’s our table of results:

FINAL RESULTS

Please feel free to download, share, embed, or otherwise distribute the video and results. And feel free to run your own trials and let us know if they’re similar or different!

For more information on the various types of large bore IV access check out our post on large bore vascular access devices. The astute will have noticed that we didn’t use a MAC-line (multi-lumen access catheter) in this test. This was because we don’t stock them in the ED we did the test in, and they are rarely (if ever) found in your average Australian ED, however most if not all of the other lines are.

This video and post were made for our new site EDProcedures so please head over there and check out our ED Procedures Course.

 

Hey, are you interested in accessing more online learning from ETM? Then head over to ETM Online and check out our new online Toxicology Course!

Share ETM

Recent Posts

ETM Podcast – Teams and Teamwork – Scott Tannenbaum

Apr 10, 2026

In this episode we interview world leading teamwork expert Dr Scott Tannenbaum, co-author of the journal article that formed the foundation for the Trauma Team and Resus Room Management model taught on the ETM Course, as well as the more recent book Teams That Work -...

ETM Webinar – Prehospital Trauma

Apr 2, 2026

The prehospital management of trauma has undergone what can only be described as a revolution over the last decade. From humble beginnings, PHaRM has become a specialty in its own right, and the standard and complexity of critical trauma care that can be delivered...

Clinical Guidelines for Major Incidents and Mass Casualty Events

Mar 12, 2026

Further to our recent podcast on Code Browns and Mass Casualty Incidents, we'd like to share the following guidelines released by Public Health England and the NHS in the UK. Clinical Guidelines for Major Incidents and Mass Casualty Events These guidelines have been...