Large Bore IV Access Showdown: Do you know which IV cannula can deliver fluid to your patient the fastest?

For decades now we’ve all been reciting the mantra that any sick or shocked patient needs:

“2 large bore IVs”

We’ve also all been taught that “short and thick does the trick” due to Poiseuille’s Law which states that flow is directly proportional to the fourth power of the radius, and inversely proportional to the length:

poiseuilles law

But despite our best efforts we couldn’t find a direct comparison of the various types of IV cannulas and catheters we used at work to see which one is actually best. We had unanswered questions that needed answers.

Which IV cannula/catheter delivers IV fluid the fastest?  
How much faster is a 14G compared to a 16G, 18G or 20G?
Is a standard 14G faster than a RIC line or sheath introducer?
And just how much slower is a central line at delivering fluid?

Behold, the Large Bore IV Access Showdown. We’ve hooked up all of the major types of IV lines you’re likely to find in an average Australian ED to a rapid infusor device, and timed how long it took to pump through a litre of saline.

So which line was best? You’ll have to watch the video and find out!
(If you can’t stand the wait, skip ahead to the results at the 10:40 mark)

So the 8.5Fr RIC line was the winner!

Here’s our video on how to insert a RIC line

Here’s our rather unscientific, but hopefully visually useful comparison of the relative speeds at which fluid can be pumped through the different lines in our test:

Relative rates of different IV cannulasClick to enlarge

And here’s our table of results:

FINAL RESULTS

Please feel free to download, share, embed, or otherwise distribute the video and results. And feel free to run your own trials and let us know if they’re similar or different!

For more information on the various types of large bore IV access check out our post on large bore vascular access devices. The astute will have noticed that we didn’t use a MAC-line (multi-lumen access catheter) in this test. This was because we don’t stock them in the ED we did the test in, and they are rarely (if ever) found in your average Australian ED, however most if not all of the other lines are.

This video and post were made for our new site EDProcedures so please head over there and check out our ED Procedures Course.

 

Hey, are you interested in accessing more online learning from ETM? Then head over to ETM Online and check out our new online Toxicology Course!

Share ETM

Recent Posts

Tox Course Module 4 – Bites, stings & envenomation

The Tox Course Module 4 - Bites, stings and evenomation is out now at ETM Online! Our most requested Tox Course topic - Bites, stings and envenomation - is now live at ETM Online! This module covers snakebite, spider bite, marine toxinology (including jellyfish...

Own the Hamilton T1 Ventilator

Off the back of the hugely successful "Own the Oxlyog" guidelines, our good friend, co-creator of our ED Procedures Course and colleague Emergency Physician Dr George Douros has just released the "Own the Hamilton T1 Ventilator - When you can no longer Own the Oxylog"...

ANZTS Conference 2024

ETM Course Director Andy Buck was lucky enough to be invited to speak on Trauma Education at the fantastic ANZTS Conference in Brisbane this week. If you're looking for the references from Andy's talk, you can find them here. Thanks to everyone who came to the...

2025 ETM Course dates now available

The ETM team has been working hard to get the 2025 course calendar finalised and our 2025 course dates have now been announced. Course dates and registration details are available here and on the 2025 course brochure here. [etm_button...